Skip to content
OneKitly

Growing a Business That Earns Less Than Its Capital Costs

Published 10/7/2026 · 4 min read · Business tools

Camille Laurent

Camille Laurent — Finance writer at OneKitly

Tax · Personal finance

Checked against 2 sources

View profile →
In short

Return on capital employed divides operating profit by the capital the business is actually using: total assets less current liabilities, here 25 million − 5 million = 20 million, giving 5 ÷ 20 = 25 %. On its own that is a number without a verdict. The verdict is the spread against what the capital costs: at a weighted cost of 8 %, the seventeen-point gap means every euro put into the business comes back with seventeen cents of value on top. Reverse the comparison and the logic reverses with it — a company earning 6 % on capital costing 8 % loses two points on everything it invests, so growth makes the owners poorer, faster. That is the single most useful thing a ratio can tell a board, and it is invisible in profit, in revenue and in every margin.

5 million of operating profit on 20 million of capital employed is a 25 % return. Against a cost of capital of 8 % that is a spread of 17 points; at 6 % it would be a spread of −2, and every extra euro invested would destroy value.

Stretching supplier terms raises the ratio without improving anything

Current liabilities are subtracted because trade credit finances part of the business at no charge, so it is not capital anyone had to provide. That makes the denominator movable: push current liabilities from 5 million to 8 million by paying suppliers later and capital employed falls to 17 million, lifting the return from 25 % to 29.4 % with no change to profit, sales or costs. The improvement is real in the sense that less of the owners' money is tied up, and hollow in the sense that it was taken from suppliers rather than earned. Read a jump in this ratio by checking whether the numerator or the denominator moved, and if it was the denominator, which line of it.

A high return can be a sign of nothing being invested

Capital employed includes assets at their written-down value, and a company that has stopped replacing its equipment sees that value fall year after year while profit holds steady. The return therefore climbs, and it climbs fastest in the last years before something has to be replaced all at once. A rising ratio driven by a shrinking denominator looks identical on a chart to one driven by a rising numerator, and only the capital expenditure line separates them. Where the ratio is used as a target, this is the failure mode to watch: the cheapest way to hit it is to defer the investment that keeps the business working.

Cost of capital
5 million of operating profit, 20 million of capital
ReturnCost of capitalSpread
25 %8 %+17 points
25 %30 %−5 points
6 %8 %−2 points

Worked with our own calculator

ROCE calculator

Given

EBIT (operating profit)
$5,000,000.00
Total assets
$25,000,000.00
Current liabilities
$5,000,000.00
Cost of capital (WACC, %)
8

Result

ROCE
25%
Capital employed
$20,000,000.00
Spread over cost of capital (points)
17

These figures are produced by the calculator below, not typed in by hand — they are recomputed whenever the tool changes.

Run it on your own figures →

Frequently asked questions

Where does the cost of capital come from?
It is a weighted blend of what the debt costs after tax and what the shareholders expect, in proportion to how much of each finances the business. The debt half is observable — it is on the loan agreements. The equity half is an estimate, usually built from a risk-free rate plus a premium for the risk of this particular business, and reasonable people produce estimates several points apart. That uncertainty is why the spread matters more than the exact number: a seventeen-point gap survives any plausible disagreement about the cost of capital, while a two-point gap does not survive rounding.
Opening capital employed or the average?
The average of the two ends, for the same reason as any ratio that divides a year by a balance: the profit was earned across twelve months while the closing balance sheet reflects only the last day. It matters most when the capital base moved a lot — an acquisition, a large disposal, a factory completed in the autumn — which is exactly when the ratio is being examined. Where the year contained such an event, report the ratio both ways and say which one the conclusion rests on.

Articles you may find interesting

All guides →
ExplainerReturn on Assets: What the Ratio Says About a Business, and What It HidesReturn on assets, return on net assets and return on capital employed are one family with two moving parts. On the same balance sheet they read 8.3%, 10.2% and 15.6% — and the two steps between them are exactly the two decisions you are making.ExplainerTwenty Per Cent Return on Equity, Half of It BorrowedNet income of 50,000 on equity of 250,000 is an ROE of 20 %. The same profit on 500,000 of equity is 10 % — the extra ten points came from the debt, not from the business.ExplainerAsset Turnover: Diagnosing Capital That Is AsleepNet sales divided by net fixed assets is one of the easiest ratios to compute and one of the least comparable. The same retailer scored 10× before the lease standard and 1.39× after it — same shops, same sales, same year.ExplainerWACC Explained, and Why the Number Is Mostly an AssumptionWACC = E/V × Re + D/V × Rd × (1 − T). The tax shield makes debt genuinely cheaper, and the cost of equity comes from CAPM — whose beta and equity risk premium are estimates that move the answer by whole percentage points, and the valuation by a quarter.ComparisonStraight-Line vs Declining-Balance DepreciationBoth methods write off exactly the same total cost. Only the timing differs — and timing is worth money. A full year-by-year schedule for one asset, the crossover year, the switch-to-straight-line convention, and the present value of the tax deferral computed at 8%.ExplainerFifty Thousand of Working Capital, and None of It SpendableCurrent assets of 150,000 less current liabilities of 100,000 gives working capital of 50,000 and a ratio of 1.5. Whether that is comfortable depends on what the 150,000 is made of.

Related tools

Sources

Spotted a mistake in this article?