Skip to content
OneKitly

How Staking Rewards Actually Work: Nominal Rate, Compounding, and What Eats It

Published 5/15/2026 · 6 min read · Finance calculators

Camille Laurent

Camille LaurentFinance writer at OneKitly

Tax · Personal finance

Checked against 2 sources

View profile
In short

Staking pays a nominal annual rate that is credited in small instalments, so the figure you end the year with is the compounded one: APY = (1 + nominal ÷ n)^n − 1, where n is the number of payout periods. At 8 percent nominal paid daily, (1 + 0.08 ÷ 365)^365 − 1 = 8.3278 percent, so 10,000 staked tokens become 10,832.78 rather than 10,800. Then subtract what the advertisement left out. A 10 percent validator commission cuts the nominal rate to 7.2 percent and the compounded return to 7.4648 percent, leaving 10,746.48 tokens — worth about $21,493 if the token trades at $2. A 21-day unbonding period during which nothing accrues trims it again, to 7.02 percent. And if the protocol is issuing new supply at 3 percent a year, your share of the network grows by (1.074648 ÷ 1.03) − 1 = 4.33 percent, not 7.46 percent, even though your token count is unambiguously higher.

An advertised 8 percent becomes 8.33 percent once daily rewards compound — and then 7.46 percent after a 10 percent validator commission, and less again after unbonding time. Here is each step, with the arithmetic laid out.

Nominal, compounded, and the gap between them

A protocol does not hand you 8 percent on 31 December. It credits a slice of it every epoch — every few minutes on some chains, every day on most staking dashboards. If each slice is restaked, the next slice is computed on a slightly larger balance, and the year ends above the headline number. That is the whole content of APY = (1 + nominal ÷ n)^n − 1: with n = 365 and a nominal 8 percent, you finish at 8.3278 percent. With monthly payouts, n = 12 and you finish at 8.30 percent. The difference between daily and monthly compounding is three hundredths of a percentage point — real, but far smaller than most yield marketing implies.

Compounding is also not automatic everywhere. Some chains restake rewards for you inside the validator balance; others credit them to a separate spendable account where they sit idle until you act. If you never claim and restake, n is effectively 1 and your 8 percent nominal really is 8 percent — you have simply left 32.78 tokens per 10,000 on the table. Check which of the two your chain does before you assume the compounded figure applies to you.

What comes off the top: commission, lock-up, slashing

Delegating to a validator costs a commission on your rewards, typically 5 to 15 percent. It applies to the reward stream, not to your principal, so it scales the nominal rate before compounding: 8 percent minus a 10 percent cut leaves 7.2 percent nominal, which compounds daily to 7.4648 percent. Your 10,000 tokens end the year at 10,746.48 instead of 10,832.78 — 86 tokens for a fee you probably never saw quoted in percentage-point terms. Zero-commission validators exist and usually cover their costs elsewhere; a commission that can be raised without notice is worth checking for.

Then there is time you are not paid for. Most proof-of-stake chains impose an unbonding period — often around 21 days — during which the tokens are neither earning nor sellable. Exit once in a year and you compound over 344 days instead of 365, which turns 7.4648 percent into 7.02 percent. Slashing is rarer but larger: a validator that double-signs or goes badly offline can cost its delegators a slice of principal, and a 5 percent slash erases more than half a year of net rewards at these rates. Neither risk appears in the number on the landing page.

Your token count rises; your share of the network can still fall

Staking rewards are usually newly issued tokens. They are not revenue paid out of profits — they are dilution, distributed to the people who stake and taken, in relative terms, from everyone who does not. That makes the honest yardstick not your token count but your share of the total supply. If the supply grows 3 percent a year and your net staking return is 7.4648 percent, your share rises by (1.074648 ÷ 1.03) − 1 = 4.33 percent. If issuance runs at 12 percent while you earn 7.4648 percent, your share falls by 4.05 percent — a shrinking slice of the network, from a wallet whose balance went up all year.

None of this touches price. A token that pays 7 percent and falls 40 percent has cost you 36 percent, and the reward stream is itself denominated in the falling asset. That is the reason to treat staking yield as a small adjustment to a position you already wanted to hold, rather than as the reason to hold it — and to compare it against the issuance schedule, the unbonding period and the validator commission before comparing it against a savings account, which it does not resemble in any respect that matters.

Worked with our own calculator

Crypto staking rewards calculator

Given

Amount staked (coins)
500
APY (%)
4

Result

Annual reward (coins)
20
Monthly reward (coins)
1.667

These figures are produced by the calculator below, not typed in by hand — they are recomputed whenever the tool changes.

Run it on your own figures

Frequently asked questions

Is APR the same as APY in staking?
No. APR is the nominal rate before compounding; APY is what you end the year with if every payout is restaked. At 8 percent nominal paid daily the two differ by 0.33 percentage points — 8 percent against 8.3278 percent. Interfaces use the two labels loosely, so check whether the figure assumes automatic restaking before you plan around it.
Why did I receive less than the advertised rate?
Usually four things at once: the validator commission is taken off the reward stream, the rate itself floats with how much of the supply is staked and falls as more people join, days spent unbonding or waiting to be activated pay nothing, and the advertised figure often assumed restaking you did not do. Work the chain backwards — nominal, minus commission, compounded, times the fraction of the year you were actually active — and the gap normally explains itself.
Does staking protect me if the token price falls?
No. Rewards are paid in the same token, so a 7 percent yield on an asset that falls 40 percent still leaves you down about 36 percent, and the lock-up means you may not be able to exit while it falls. Staking changes how many tokens you hold, never what they are worth.

Articles you may find interesting

All guides
GuideYield Farming: What an Advertised APY Actually PaysThe number on the farm's front page is a gross figure before every subtraction. Here is a 120 percent APY walked down, one layer at a time, to the 33.6 percent that actually landed — plus why APR and APY are not the same number.ExplainerWhat Is Slippage in Crypto? Price Impact, Tolerance and What It CostsPrice impact is arithmetic: on a constant-product pool it equals your trade size divided by the reserve plus your trade. Here is the formula, a table of trade size against impact, and why the setting called slippage tolerance changes none of it.ExplainerImpermanent Loss Explained: What Providing Liquidity Really CostsImpermanent loss is not a fee and it is not temporary: it is the gap between your liquidity position and simply having held the two tokens. Here is the formula, a table of price change against loss, and the fee income you would need to come out ahead.ExplainerVolatility Is Not Risk, and the Square Root of Time Is a ChoiceAnnualised volatility = period standard deviation × √(periods per year), and that √t scaling assumes independent increments. It is a model, not arithmetic: at a daily autocorrelation of 0.1 a 60 percent annualised figure should read 66.3. The payload is volatility drag — the arithmetic mean exceeds the geometric by about σ²/2, so at 8 percent average return and 40 percent volatility the compound outcome is zero.GuideHow Crypto Tax Is Calculated: The Principles That Apply EverywhereRates differ by country, the mechanics rarely do: a disposal triggers a gain, the gain is proceeds minus cost basis, and staking is income. Here is the calculation and where jurisdictions diverge.ExplainerDollar-Cost Averaging: What It Actually Buys YouSpending a fixed amount each period buys more units when the price is low, so your average cost is the harmonic mean of the prices while the average price is the arithmetic mean — always lower, by 4.10 percent on the path worked through here. Against a lump sum, a 200,000-path simulation puts DCA's standard deviation 41 percent lower and its expected terminal wealth $337 lower on $12,000.

Related tools

This article explains how a calculation works. It is not investment advice. Leveraged trading and mining can lose more than you put in, and past results say nothing about future ones.

Sources

Spotted a mistake in this article?