Skip to content
OneKitly

If the Variance Is Not the Mean, It Is Not Poisson

Published 10/9/2026 · 4 min read · Everyday calculators

Daniel Okonkwo

Daniel Okonkwo — Front-end developer and tech writer at OneKitly

Web performance · File formats

Checked against 2 sources

View profile →
In short

The Poisson distribution describes how many independent events land in a fixed window when they arrive at a constant average rate. Its single parameter is that rate, and the striking consequence is that it also fixes the spread: for this distribution the variance equals the mean, both being five here. That equality is the best diagnostic there is. Count arrivals over many windows, compute the mean and the variance of those counts, and compare them: if the variance is close to the mean, the model fits and the probabilities below are usable. If the variance is far larger — which it usually is for support tickets, website visits and machine failures — the events are clustering rather than arriving independently, and every quantity computed from the Poisson assumption will understate how bad a bad interval gets.

With an average of five events per interval, exactly three occur 14.0 % of the time, none at all 0.7 %, and ten or more 3.2 % — about once every 31 intervals. The distribution has one parameter, and it sets both the mean and the variance.

Capacity sized on the average is exceeded routinely

Five on average does not mean five most of the time. Exactly five occurs in about 17 % of intervals, and everything else happens in the other 83 — including none at all in one interval in a hundred and fifty, and ten or more in 3.2 %, which is roughly once every thirty-one intervals. A queue, a switchboard or a worker rota built for the average will therefore be over capacity several times an hour if the interval is a minute. Size against a chosen upper percentile instead, and state which one: designing for the ninety-fifth means accepting that one interval in twenty overflows, and that is a policy decision rather than an arithmetic one.

Constant rate is the assumption that fails first

Almost nothing arrives at a genuinely constant rate. Web traffic has a daily shape and a weekly one; support tickets spike after a release; road accidents cluster around weather. Fitting one rate across a period that contains several regimes produces a distribution wider than the Poisson it claims to be, which is exactly the excess variance described above and is often mistaken for clustering when it is really a moving average. The fix is to split the data into windows within which the rate is plausibly steady — hours of the day, days of the week — and fit each separately, which usually restores the equality of mean and variance inside each window.

Probability
Average of five events per interval
OutcomeProbability
Exactly 00.67 %
Exactly 314.04 %
3 or fewer26.50 %
10 or more3.18 %

Worked with our own calculator

Poisson distribution calculator

Given

Average rate λ
5.5
Number of events k
6

Result

P(X = k)
0.157
P(X ≤ k)
0.686
P(X ≥ k)
0.471
Mean = variance = λ
5.5

These figures are produced by the calculator below, not typed in by hand — they are recomputed whenever the tool changes.

Run it on your own figures →

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from the binomial distribution?
The binomial counts successes among a fixed number of trials, so it has a ceiling — twenty coin flips cannot give twenty-one heads. Poisson counts events in a window with no upper bound: nothing in the model forbids a hundred arrivals in a minute that averages five, it merely makes it astronomically unlikely. The two converge when the number of trials is large and the chance of each is small, which is why Poisson is the practical choice for rare events among many opportunities — a few defects in a long production run, a handful of clicks among many impressions.
Can the rate be a fraction?
Yes, and it usually is. The parameter is an average over a window, so half an event per hour is a perfectly ordinary description of something that happens roughly twelve times a day; the counts it predicts are still whole numbers. Changing the window rescales the parameter proportionally — a rate of five per minute is three hundred per hour — and the probabilities change accordingly, which is why the window has to be stated with the rate. A model fitted per minute and applied per hour is out by a factor of sixty in the parameter and by very much more in the tail.

Articles you may find interesting

All guides →

Related tools

Sources

Spotted a mistake in this article?