Skip to content
OneKitly

Springs in Series Behave Like Resistors in Parallel

Published 10/13/2026 · 4 min read · Everyday calculators

Daniel Okonkwo

Daniel Okonkwo — Front-end developer and tech writer at OneKitly

Web performance · File formats

Checked against 2 sources

View profile →
In short

A spring's constant says how many newtons it takes to stretch it by a metre, so a 500 N/m spring moves 0.1 m under a 50 N load. Join two of them end to end and the assembly is softer, not stiffer: each one carries the full load and each one stretches, so the travel doubles to 0.2 m and the effective constant halves to 250 N/m. Put them side by side and they share the load, halving the travel to 0.05 m and doubling the constant to 1,000. Anyone who has wired a circuit will notice the rule is inverted relative to resistance — resistors add in series and combine reciprocally in parallel, springs do the opposite — because a spring constant is the analogue of a conductance rather than a resistance.

Two 500 N/m springs end to end give 250 N/m; side by side they give 1,000. Under the same 50 N load that is 0.2 m of travel against 0.05 m, and 5 joules stored against 1.25.

The energy column is the interesting one

Half the constant times the travel squared gives 2.5 joules for one spring, 5 for the pair in series and 1.25 for the pair in parallel — under an identical 50 N load. The soft arrangement stores four times as much as the stiff one, because energy is force times distance and the soft one moves four times further. That is why a long soft spring makes a better shock absorber than a short stiff one of the same rating: absorbing a given impact means storing its energy somewhere, and the stiff spring runs out of travel before it has taken much in. It is also why a stiff assembly returns to position faster — it holds less to give back.

Cutting a spring in half doubles its constant

The series rule read backwards says so: a full-length spring is two half-length springs joined end to end, so each half must be twice as stiff as the whole. This is a genuinely useful workshop fact — a spring that is too soft can be shortened rather than replaced — and it also warns that a spring cut to fit is no longer the component on the datasheet. The rated maximum load is unchanged, but it is now reached at half the travel, and the energy the shortened spring can hold before bottoming out has halved. Coil springs are wound with the ends ground flat for a reason, so a cut end usually needs finishing before it will sit square.

Travel
Two 500 N/m springs, 50 N load
ArrangementEffective kTravelEnergy stored
One spring500 N/m0.10 m2.5 J
Two in series250 N/m0.20 m5.0 J
Two in parallel1,000 N/m0.05 m1.25 J

Worked with our own calculator

Spring constant calculator (Hooke's law)

Given

Solve for
Force F
Configuration
N in series (k/N)
Number of springs N
4
Force F (N)
100
Displacement x (m)
0.2
Spring constant k (N/m)
1,000

Result

Result
50
Effective k (N/m)
250
Elastic energy (J)
5

These figures are produced by the calculator below, not typed in by hand — they are recomputed whenever the tool changes.

Run it on your own figures →

Frequently asked questions

When does Hooke's law stop working?
When the spring is stretched far enough to deform permanently, and rather earlier than most people expect. Up to the elastic limit the force is genuinely proportional to the extension and the spring returns to its exact original length; past it, the metal yields and the spring comes back longer than it started, with a different constant from then on. A spring that no longer holds its rated load is usually one that was overextended once rather than one that wore out gradually. The linear model also fails at the other end, when the coils touch: the constant does not rise smoothly there, it goes effectively infinite.
Why is the constant a conductance and not a resistance?
Because of which quantity is shared and which one adds up. In a series circuit the current is common and the voltages add; in a series of springs the force is common and the displacements add. Force therefore lines up with current and displacement with voltage, which makes the spring constant — force per displacement — the counterpart of current per voltage, that is a conductance. Once the pairing is made the rest follows without any extra thinking: whatever combines reciprocally for conductance combines reciprocally for stiffness, in exactly the same arrangement.

Articles you may find interesting

All guides →
ExplainerHooke's Law Explained: F = kx, Real Spring Constants, and Where It Stops HoldingHooke's law says force is proportional to stretch — but only below the elastic limit. Here is F = kx with worked numbers, what a 200 N/m spring actually feels like, and how springs combine.ExplainerA Stiletto Heel Presses Forty-Eight Times Harder Than an ElephantA 60 kg person on one square centimetre of heel exerts 5.89 MPa. A five-tonne elephant on four feet of 0.1 m² each exerts 123 kPa. Same physics, opposite areas.ExplainerHardened Steel Is No Stiffer Than Mild SteelA 10 mm² steel bar 2 m long stretches 1 mm under 1,000 N: 200 GPa. The same bar in aluminium stretches 2.86 mm and in softwood 20 mm. Heat treatment changes none of it.ExplainerFriction Does Not Care How Big the Contact Patch IsA coefficient of 0.3 against a normal force of 100 N gives 30 N of friction, and the area never enters the formula. What does enter it, and is usually got wrong, is the normal force.ExplainerResistors in Series and in Parallel: The Formulas, and the Three Things They Do Not Tell YouSeries adds, parallel adds reciprocals — that part is easy. The parts that catch people: which member dominates the answer, why two 5 % resistors in parallel are still 5 %, and why the smallest resistor in a parallel pair takes the largest share of the power.ExplainerCapacitors in Series: the Smallest One Decides, and Then It Fails100, 220 and 330 µF in series come to 56.9 µF — less than the smallest. Put 100 µF and 1 µF in series and the total is 0.99 µF, while the small one carries 99 % of the voltage.

Related tools

Sources

Spotted a mistake in this article?