Skip to content
OneKitly

One Balance Sheet, Three Ratios, and Only One of Them Has a Ceiling

Published 10/7/2026 · 3 min read · Business tools

Camille Laurent

Camille Laurent — Finance writer at OneKitly

Tax · Personal finance

Checked against 2 sources

View profile →
In short

The three figures are the same fact arranged three ways: liabilities over assets is 500,000 ÷ 1,200,000 = 41.7 %, the equity share is the remainder at 58.3 %, and debt over equity is 500,000 ÷ 700,000 = 0.71. Where they differ is in how they behave under stress. As losses eat the equity, debt-to-assets creeps towards 100 % and stops there, because liabilities cannot exceed assets by more than the equity that has already gone. Debt-to-equity has no such limit: at 1,100,000 of liabilities it reads 11, and at 1,190,000 it reads 119. A covenant written on the second therefore trips explosively in exactly the circumstances where a lender most wants a stable measure, which is why the same document often carries both.

500,000 of liabilities against 1,200,000 of assets is 41.7 % debt, 58.3 % equity and a debt-to-equity of 0.71. The third one runs to infinity as the equity vanishes; the first cannot pass 100 %.

Assets are at book value, and book value is a history

The denominator is what the accounts say the assets are worth, which for a building bought decades ago and depreciated ever since bears no relation to what it would sell for. Two companies with identical premises can therefore report very different ratios depending on when each bought, and a revaluation improves the number without a single thing happening in the world. The distortion runs the other way too: goodwill from an acquisition sits in total assets at what was paid, which flatters the ratio until the day it is written down and the ratio deteriorates sharply for a reason that was already true.

Not everything on the liabilities side is debt

Total liabilities includes money owed to suppliers, deferred revenue from customers who have paid in advance, provisions for future costs and accrued wages, none of which behaves like borrowed money. Trade payables carry no interest and no covenant; deferred revenue is a promise to deliver rather than to repay. A ratio built on all liabilities therefore answers a different question from one built on interest-bearing debt alone, and lenders usually mean the second when they say leverage. Say which of the two a figure uses, because a subscription business with a year of prepayments can look heavily indebted while owing nothing to anybody with a loan agreement.

Debt to assets
1,200,000 of assets, liabilities rising
LiabilitiesDebt to assetsDebt to equity
500,00041.7 %0.71
600,00050.0 %1.00
1,100,00091.7 %11.0
1,190,00099.2 %119.0

Worked with our own calculator

Debt-to-asset ratio calculator

Given

Total liabilities
$500,000.00
Total assets
$1,200,000.00

Result

Debt-to-asset ratio
41.67%
Equity-financed share
58.33%
Debt-to-equity (×)
0.714

These figures are produced by the calculator below, not typed in by hand — they are recomputed whenever the tool changes.

Run it on your own figures →

Frequently asked questions

What level of debt to assets is safe?
It depends on how steady the earnings are and how sellable the assets. A utility with contracted revenue and physical infrastructure can carry a ratio that would be reckless for a fashion retailer whose main asset is stock that goes out of season. The question the ratio cannot answer on its own is whether the business can service what it owes, which is a matter of cash flow rather than of balances — so read it alongside interest cover and debt service coverage, and treat a comfortable balance sheet with thin coverage as the more dangerous of the two combinations.
Do leases count as debt?
Under the accounting standards now in force in most places, yes: a lease puts a right-of-use asset on one side and a lease liability on the other, so both the numerator and the denominator grow. That change alone moved the reported ratios of retailers and airlines substantially without altering a single contract, which is worth remembering when comparing figures across the years in which it took effect. Comparing a company's ratio today with its ratio from before the change compares two different accounting worlds.

Articles you may find interesting

All guides →
ComparisonInterest Coverage and the Ratios a Lender Actually TestsA loan agreement's covenants are the ratios that can put a solvent, profitable company into default. Interest coverage, times interest earned and DSCR are not three measures — and the one that adds principal repayment is the one that bites.ExplainerCovering Your Interest Ten Times Says Nothing About Repaying the LoanEBIT of 500,000 against interest of 50,000 is a cover of 10×. Refinance at a rate 3.6 times higher and the same business covers 2.78× — and neither figure has looked at the principal.ExplainerA DSCR of 1.25 Is the Lender's Cushion, Not Yours150,000 of net operating income against 120,000 of debt service is a coverage of 1.25 — the usual threshold. It also means a 20 % fall in income wipes the cover out entirely.ExplainerTwenty Per Cent Return on Equity, Half of It BorrowedNet income of 50,000 on equity of 250,000 is an ROE of 20 %. The same profit on 500,000 of equity is 10 % — the extra ten points came from the debt, not from the business.ExplainerFifty-Five Days to Get Paid on Thirty-Day Terms180,000 outstanding against 1,200,000 of annual sales is 54.75 days of collection and 6.67 turns a year. On thirty-day terms, that gap is a quarter of a million financed for free.ExplainerFifty Thousand of Working Capital, and None of It SpendableCurrent assets of 150,000 less current liabilities of 100,000 gives working capital of 50,000 and a ratio of 1.5. Whether that is comfortable depends on what the 150,000 is made of.

Related tools

Sources

Spotted a mistake in this article?