Skip to content
OneKitly

A 5,000 mAh Power Bank Does Not Hold 5,000 mAh for Your Phone

Published 9/29/2026 · 3 min read · Everyday calculators

Daniel Okonkwo

Daniel Okonkwo — Front-end developer and tech writer at OneKitly

Web performance · File formats

Checked against 2 sources

View profile →
In short

Capacity divided by load gives the theoretical runtime: 5,000 mAh at 500 mA is 10 hours. Multiply by an efficiency of 85 % and it becomes 8.5 hours, or 510 minutes. That 15 % is not padding; it is real energy lost turning the cell's voltage into whatever the device needs. The same loss makes the number printed on a power bank misleading. A 5,000 mAh cell at 3.7 volts stores 18.5 watt-hours; delivering that at the 5 volts a USB port supplies, with the same 85 % efficiency, gives about 15.7 watt-hours — enough for roughly 3,145 mAh at 5 volts. A phone with a 4,000 mAh battery at 3.85 volts needs 15.4 watt-hours for a full charge, so the bank manages one charge and essentially nothing more. Nothing here is a manufacturer's exaggeration; the two numbers are simply quoted at different voltages.

5,000 mAh drawn at 500 mA with 85 % efficiency runs for 8.5 hours instead of the arithmetic's 10. The same 15 % explains why a 5,000 mAh bank barely fills a 4,000 mAh phone once.

The load in the box is an average that may not exist

Very few devices draw a steady current. A sensor that sleeps at 50 microamps and wakes for two seconds at 80 milliamps every minute has an average nowhere near either figure, and getting it wrong in the optimistic direction is how a design that promised a year in the field returns after seven weeks. Work out the average from the duty cycle — how long at each level, times how often — rather than from the datasheet's active figure, and remember the cell's own self-discharge, which is the term that dominates once the average current gets small enough.

Cold and age both take capacity away

The capacity on the label is measured warm and new, and both conditions expire. A lithium cell in the cold delivers noticeably less than its rating and recovers when it warms, which is why a phone that dies at 30 % on a winter platform often restarts indoors with charge left. Ageing takes capacity away permanently, at a rate set mostly by how often the cell is cycled and how hot it gets while charging. Neither effect belongs in this calculation, which is why a design that has to work in year three at minus five degrees should be sized on a fraction of the rating rather than on the rating.

Energy
A 5,000 mAh cell, from the label to the phone
StageEnergy
Stored, 5,000 mAh at 3.7 V18.5 Wh
Delivered at 85 % efficiency15.7 Wh
Needed by a 4,000 mAh phone15.4 Wh

Worked with our own calculator

Battery life calculator

Given

Capacity (mAh)
10,000
Load current (mA)
1,000
Efficiency (%)
170

Result

Runtime (hours)
17
Runtime (minutes)
1,020

These figures are produced by the calculator below, not typed in by hand — they are recomputed whenever the tool changes.

Run it on your own figures →

Frequently asked questions

What efficiency should I enter?
It depends on what sits between the cell and the load. A device running straight off the cell with a low-dropout regulator loses whatever the voltage difference costs and can be well under 85 %; a good switching converter can reach the low nineties; a USB power bank has a step-up and then the phone's own charger, two conversions in series, and the product of the two is what you get. When in doubt use 85 % for a single conversion and 80 % for a chain of two, then measure the real thing once and replace the guess.
Why is the phone battery quoted at 3.85 volts and the bank at 3.7?
Both figures are nominal voltages — a single number standing in for a voltage that actually falls from around 4.2 volts when full to around 3.0 when empty. Different cell chemistries and different charging strategies give different averages, and manufacturers pick the one that matches their cell. That is why watt-hours, which multiply the two together, are the only figure that can be compared between products, and why airlines print their cabin limits in watt-hours rather than in mAh.

Articles you may find interesting

All guides →
ExplainerDouble the Current and the Cable Gets Four Times HotterPower lost as heat is current squared times resistance. Ten metres of 1.5 mm² extension lead has 0.233 Ω there and back: 23.3 W at 10 A, and 59.7 W at 16 A.ExplainerThe Voltage Divider: The Formula Is Trivial, the Assumption Behind It Is NotVout = Vin·R2/(R1+R2) is only true when nothing is connected to the output. Draw current and the voltage collapses, by an amount that follows one exact law. Here is that law, the ten-times rule checked against it, and why a lower-resistance divider costs you power forever.ComparisonSolar Panels: the Self-Consumption Rate Decides the PaybackSince June 2026 a French rooftop is paid 1.1 cents for an exported kilowatt-hour and avoids 25.61 cents by consuming the same one. That ratio of 23 to 1 makes the self-consumption rate — the variable almost every quote omits — worth more than the amount of sun falling on the roof.How-toHow to Convert kWh to CO₂: Grid Emission Factors ExplainedConvert electricity in kWh into CO₂ emissions using your grid's emission factor — and understand why that factor differs so much by country and time.ExplainerWhat Is Voltage Drop? Why Long Wires Lose VoltageVoltage drop is the voltage lost along a wire due to its resistance. Learn how length, gauge, and current affect it, and why it matters for your circuits.How-toWhat Size Solar Battery Do I Need? Sizing by Daily UseSize a solar battery from your daily energy use, the days of autonomy you want, and the battery's usable depth of discharge.

Related tools

Sources

Spotted a mistake in this article?