Skip to content
Allin
Sign up · Sign in

Blood Sugar Converter (mg/dL ↔ mmol/L)

Convert blood glucose between mg/dL and mmol/L in both directions, and see where the value falls against the ADA reference bands.

Related tools

All Medical & clinical tools →
Blood Donation Time CalculatorFind your next eligible donation date by donation type, using either the American Red Cross or the French EFS intervals.Blood Pressure Category CalculatorClassify a reading with the ACC/AHA 2017 or the European ESC/ESH scale, plotted on a chart, with mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure.Blood Type CalculatorPredict a child's possible ABO and Rh blood types, with probabilities, from both parents' blood groups.Blood alcohol calculatorEstimate your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) with the Widmark formula.Daily sugar intake calculatorFind your WHO free-sugar limit from your daily calorie intake.HbA1c Calculator (A1c ↔ eAG)Enter HbA1c, average glucose in mg/dL or in mmol/L and get the other two, plus the IFCC value in mmol/mol.Heart Disease Risk CalculatorEstimate your 10-year risk of heart attack and stroke with the 2013 ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations (ASCVD), from age, sex, cholesterol, blood pressure and risk factors.Insulin Sensitivity Factor CalculatorEstimate your correction factor from the total daily dose with the 1500/1700/1800/2000 rule, in mg/dL or mmol/L, plus an optional correction dose.

Blood Sugar Converter (mg/dL ↔ mmol/L) is free to use as often as you like, directly from this page. It sits under Medical & clinical in our catalogue, alongside Blood Donation Time Calculator and Blood Pressure Category Calculator.

How to use it

  1. Open the tool — no signup or install needed.
  2. Enter your input or adjust the available options.
  3. Get your result instantly, then copy or download it.

Frequently asked questions

What is Blood Sugar Converter (mg/dL ↔ mmol/L)?

Convert blood glucose between mg/dL and mmol/L in both directions, and see where the value falls against the ADA reference bands.

When would I actually use this?

Checking one clinical number against the definition that gives it meaning: a dose against a body weight, a laboratory value corrected for the albumin or glucose that distorted it, a blood pressure against a guideline's threshold table, a heart rate or a basal metabolic rate against the formula that defines it.

What is the most common mistake?

Reading the output as a finding. Every figure here is arithmetic on numbers you typed: a correction formula measures nothing, and a threshold table classifies one reading rather than a person. Blood pressure in particular means little until it has been measured repeatedly on separate occasions, and a dose worked out here is a way of checking a prescription, never of writing one.

How is Blood Sugar Converter (mg/dL ↔ mmol/L) different from Blood Donation Time Calculator?

They sit next to each other but answer different questions: Blood Donation Time Calculator is the one to open when you need it to find your next eligible donation date by donation type, using either the American Red Cross or the French EFS intervals. Pick whichever matches what you're starting from — both are free.

Is there a tool for the next step?

Blood Pressure Category Calculator is the closest one after this: Classify a reading with the ACC/AHA 2017 or the European ESC/ESH scale, plotted on a chart, with mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure.

What else is worth having open alongside it?

Blood Type Calculator and Blood alcohol calculator — they come up in the same task often enough to be worth a second tab.

Where do the figures come from?

Each tool names the published formula it applies, on its own page: the Payne correction for calcium, Katz (1.6) and Hillier (2.4) for glucose-corrected sodium, Mifflin-St Jeor for basal metabolic rate, Widmark for blood alcohol, 220 − age for maximum heart rate, the 2013 ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations for cardiovascular risk, and five published formulas side by side for body surface area. The classification tools use the guideline tables themselves — ACC/AHA 2017, ESC/ESH and ESC 2024 for blood pressure, the ADA Standards of Care for glucose — and where guidelines disagree the tool shows the reading under each rather than picking one. None of this is a diagnosis, and none of it knows the history, medication or comorbidity that decides what a number means.

Further reading

All guides →
ExplainerBlood Sugar Units: mg/dL, mmol/L, and Why Both ExistThe conversion factor is not 18 — it is 18.016, and it is the molar mass of glucose divided by ten. Here is where it comes from, which countries use which unit, and every diagnostic threshold in both scales with the guideline it belongs to.ExplainerHbA1c to Average Blood Sugar: The Full Conversion TableAn HbA1c of 7 percent corresponds to an average glucose of about 154 mg/dL, or 8.5 mmol/L, or 53 mmol/mol. Here is the whole table, the formulas behind it, and when the number cannot be trusted.ExplainerThe Insulin Sensitivity Factor and the 1800 RuleThe correction factor says how far one unit of insulin moves glucose, and the classical estimate is 1800 divided by the total daily dose in mg/dL — or 100 divided by it in mmol/L. Those are the same rule, and here is the arithmetic that proves it, plus why stacking is the error that actually hurts.ExplainerThe Carbohydrate-to-Insulin Ratio, and the Rule That Estimates ItThe ratio says how many grams of carbohydrate one unit of insulin covers, and the usual starting estimate is 500 divided by the total daily dose. Here is where that number comes from, how sharply it moves across daily doses, why a 450 version exists, and the three things it quietly assumes.ExplainerCorrected Sodium, and Why Glucose Moves ItHigh blood glucose pulls water out of cells and dilutes the sodium in it, so a measured sodium in a hyperglycaemic patient reads lower than the real one. Here is the correction, both of the published factors, a case where they disagree by 4 mmol/L, and the different problem that lipids cause.ExplainerWeight-Based Dosing, and Where the Arithmetic Goes WrongMilligrams per kilogram is one multiplication, and that is exactly why it fails: the documented errors are unit slips, misplaced decimal points and the wrong body weight, not hard maths. Here is the arithmetic done properly, the three body weights that give three different answers, and what body surface area changes.